Kashmir issue originated from the division of Indian sub-continent into two independent states (Pakistan and India) in 1947. It remains an unsettled issue for the last sixty-eight years despite having a resolution passed in the United Nations Security Council (UNSCR-47) which says the issue of Kashmir be solved through a plebicite. It is reflecting the lack of sincerity of the international community on one hand while on the other hand it is revealing power politics; “might is right.”
Pakistan claims Kashmir on the ground of it being a Muslim majority state on its eastern border while Indian claim is based on the accession of state’s ruler (at the time of Partition) Raja Hari Singh. The issues of all other princely states were resolved sooner or later except Kashmir. Why Kashmir issue was not solved?
It was the geostrategic importance of Kashmir that put both India and Pakistan in a struggle to get whole Kashmir. Other princely states did not have such a unique geostrategic importance and proximity both to India and Pakistan as Kashmir did. Moreover, the visions of zero-sum gain (of Kashmir) both by India and Pakistan (both countries wanted to grab whole Kashmir) made the situation further complex.
Later, India and Pakistan decided to settle Kashmir problem by dialogues between them without considering the will of Kashmiris but they could not resolve it. Now Pakistan has realized that the presence of Kashmiris in dialogue process can be fruitful to give a better solution and it emphasizes that dialogue on Kashmir should between three parties: Pakistan, India and Kashmiris, rather than just between India and Pakistan which India has rejected once again and declared that there will be bilateral dialogue just between India and Pakistan.
In last sixty eight years, several solutions were proposed to resolve Kashmir issue including division of whole state on the basis of ethnic majority. If Kashmir would be divided on religious basis, Kashmir Valley, Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan would become part of Pakistan, and Jammu and Ladakh would go to India. The other idea was the independence of Kashmir by demilitarization of Indian and Pakistani forces from Kashmir. Another idea was of “condominium” or “confederation” in which it was proposed to have a joint control on Kashmir by both India and Pakistan. The most popular idea however was to solve Kashmir according to the resolution of the United Nations. A plebiscite was to be held throughout the state of Jammu and Kashmir which was frequently supported by Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Any of these ideas was not implemented for
However, none of these ideas was implemented to solve the issue of Kashmir. Its reason is that sometimes Indian behavior was not serious and other times Pakistan’s initiatives prevented it to reach some meaningful solution.
It is important to note that both India and Pakistan do not want to lose the area of Kashmir under their control, so they are not showing any flexibility altogether, or if any flexibility has been shown, it could not give some meaningful solution because of some internal problems. According to former Foreign Minister of Pakistan Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri, Pakistan and India were about to reach a possible solution of Kashmir issue during Musharraf’s regime but failed because of Judicial Crisis in Pakistan.
What is the possible solution of Kashmir issue under present circumstances? Full fledge dialogues between India and Pakistan has been suspended for several years. The recent Indian Foreign Secretary visit to Islamabad was not a step to restore dialogues but it was a part of his visit to all SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) countries. Pakistan wants to restore dialogues and recently some green signals are also coming from New Delhi.
It is possible that both India and Pakistan may start dialogue under international pressure but, will they discuss Kashmir issue? If they do, will they succeed to resolve it? The present Indian regime is not ready to show any flexibility over Kashmir issue and it is not ready to accept Kashmiris as a party in the dialogue process. It means there is no possibility of a viable solution of Kashmir issue under these circumstances.
Both India and Pakistan have a very strong defense and the addition of nuclear dimension has further reduced the possibility low-level war. It is not possible both for India and Pakistan to grab this territory from one another using war.
Today, the priorities of countries are changing and economic targets are foremost for them to become a great power, so they are burying their hatch. Its best example is China, which has border conflict with India but it has about $100 billion trade per year with India. It has a number of conflicts with Japan and many other countries in South China Sea, but it has good trade and economic relations with these countries.
Can India and Pakistan form the same pattern of relations between them? Pakistan has kept Kashmir as a first priority, so there is no possibility of such deal between Pakistan and India. But present financial crisis and economic problems may change Pakistan’s priorities and can force it to put Kashmir issue on lower priorities.
However, if it does happen, it will be a matter of concern for Kashmiris. In fact, the most suffering party of Kashmir issue is the Kashmiris. They were ignored for decades by both India and Pakistan and it has aroused anxiety among Kashmiri people and has increased the number of youth joining freedom movement to strengthen independence movement. The stagnancy between India and Pakistan on Kashmir issue is strengthening the independence movement further and today the number of Kashmiri people who want independence are much more than they were in 1970s or 80s. In other words today the number of Kashmiris wanting interp (ilhaq) is much less than it used to be in the past.
In recent elections, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) announced that it would end special status of Jammu and Kashmir given in Article 370 of Indian Constitution; it was defeated and a record turnout was seen in Kashmir. Indian Prime Minister said that this record turnout was showing that Kashmiris want to live with India but in fact, this turnout was a strategy to prevent BJP from capturing power in Kashmir and to end article 370 of Indian constitution.
Presently, both India and Pakistan are too much engaged in their internal issues. The war on terror has diverted Pakistan’s attention from Kashmir issue. India is handling local independence movement by violent means and has communicated international community that Kashmiri armed struggle is on the behalf of organizations that are involved in terrorism. This Indian narrative has weakened the independence movement in Indian-held Kashmir but election result has shown that Kashmiris do not want to live with India.
The best solution of Kashmir issue is to follow United Nations Security Council Resolution 47. India has not allowed plebiscite and it seems that it will not allow referendum in future as well. Currently, the nationalist movements in Kashmir are stronger and these movements include people of all ethnicities (Hindu, Muslims, Buddhists and Sikhs) and all of them are ready to live together in Kashmir because it is only possible solution for them to prevent division of Kashmir. If these communities cooperate they can get independence as well as union of all divided fragments of Kashmir under the control of three different countries, otherwise they have to accept present division permanently.
View Comments (2)
Muhammad Ali Zoaib is going to give a "balanced" view of Kashmir ? LOL
If Kashmiris don't want to live with India - they can LEAVE. India is not going to leave and nothing Pakistan or its terrorist proxies can do to change that fact.
Nobody in the world recognizes Pakistan's excuses for its claim to Kashmir and according the UN resolutions this Pakistani quotes - Pakistan is required to HAND OVER its occupied territory to India so that a plebiscite may be conducted. Instead the "purveyors" of Muslims and KAshmiri independence - the Pakistanis conveniently donated more than a million sq kilometers of Kashmiri territory to China - a fact conveniently forgotten here.
India has no interest in negotiating with a Pakistani government that is incapable and not powerful enough to make any deals on behalf of Pakistan and neither is India interested in negotiating with so-called "Kashmiris" who are not elected and represent feudal Kashmiri landlords and mullahs who presume to speak on behalf of all Kashmiris!
I would say a well began but poorly ended article. Writer is ignoring the fact that the United Nations interest in the situation of Kashmir began in 1947-1948 during the decolonization process of the British Empire in south Asia. The leaders of what became Pakistan and India reached an agreement with the British that the people of Kashmir would decide their own disposition. That year, the Security Council established the United Nations Commission on India and Pakistan (UNCIP) which, in addition to the Security Council itself, adopted resolutions on 13 August 1948, declaring that the final disposition of Kashmir was to be via a plebiscite of the Kashmiri people carried out under the auspices of the United Nations.
By doing so UNCIP actually granted a right of self-determination to the people of Jammu and Kashmir and to carry out the plebiscite, the Security Council also appointed a Plebiscite Administrator. But sooner, in very next year in 1949, Kashmiris right of self-determination was changed with the right of accession to Pakistan or India, on Pakistan’s request in next resolution of UNCIP on 5 January 1949. According to which, now the people of Jammu and Kashmir have right either to be a part of India or Pakistan.
So anyone who is actually demanding plebiscite in its altered sense is trying to make Kashmir a part of India or Pakistan, but not Kashmir. So an acceptable solution for Kashmiris is a plebiscite with the right of self-determination, which requires demilitarization of Kashmir from both India and Pakistan.